[OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector

[Richard Weait]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Graham Jones <grahamjones139 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree, it sounds mad, and I find it hard to believe that 'we' would do
> this.   Surely we need to apply a bit of pragmatism to  this and think about
> 'reasonableness'?
>
> I can see that it is reasonable to delete the contributions from someone who
> has explicitly said that they do not agree to the new terms - that is a
> shame, but it is their choice.
>
> From the discussion on this list (and I have not looked into it properly - I
> gave up on thinking about licences when the 'debate' all got out of hand
> earlier in the year), it sounds as though if someone who has neither
> accepted nor declined the terms has touched an object, that object will be
> deleted - is this really the intention of those looking after this licence
> change?

"Touched" no.  "Created" yes.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/What_is_clean%3F