[OSM-talk] What the license change is going to do to the map

Joseph Reeves iknowjoseph at gmail.com
Wed Feb 9 17:37:53 GMT 2011

But that's got nothing to do with the licensing change - that's an
issue of you ripping off Google Maps.

Please everyone, lets not feed the troll.

On 9 February 2011 17:26, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Al Haraka <alharaka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>>> http://www.sharedmap.org/bna.html
>>> http://www.sharedmap.org/before.PNG
>>> http://www.sharedmap.org/after.PNG
>> I enjoy a thread that is well on its way to a flame war as much as the
>> next guy, but do you mind telling us the methodology used to achieve
>> this result?  Last time it was discussed, there was a lot of debate on
>> how to properly tag a node, way, or relation as license compatible or
>> not because this is a multi-user system.  I am curious: how did you
>> reach your conclusions?
> The board voted to delete my contributions, and this is the before and after.
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

More information about the talk mailing list