[OSM-talk] Underground / hovering buildings
Nathan Edgars II
neroute2 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 22:11:16 GMT 2011
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> layer=-1 tells only that the thing is under layer=0 and over layer=-2,
> nothing in relation to 'ground level' (some rivers or roads may have
> layer=-1 or layer=1 on most of its length).
No, ground level is layer 0. A nonzero layer on a ground-level feature is an
However, layer=-1 does not mean it's covered by surface, if the surface has
been removed. For example, during construction of a building, the basement
will be open to the air.
For the original question, I'd probably use layer=-1, covered=yes,
underground=yes, location=underground, and enough other semi-made-up tags
that one is bound to stick.
In addition, it's not always clear what ground level is in dense urban
environments. In part of downtown Chicago, the pre-civilization ground level
is now under two levels of elevated streets. But there are buildings that
fill the formerly-open spaces, so in some sense ground level has moved up
two layers. Here it's probably best to explicitly label layer=0 on
whatever's chosen as the current ground level.
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Underground-hovering-buildings-tp6025288p6029515.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the talk