[OSM-talk] [talk-au] Hitting reset on talk-au
osm at inbox.org
Tue Jul 12 14:39:46 BST 2011
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Steve Coast <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
> We can block the 'main' people. Then you have to draw the line somewhere between the good
> and the bad anonymous posters. I would suggest anyone who's posted that they want to disrupt
> the project and anyone operating under a pseudonym.
I think it's okay to block/remove anyone who is here to disrupt the
project. If they've said that in the past, and have not made a strong
indication that it wasn't/is no longer true, then by all means they
shouldn't be on the list.
As for pseudonyms, I can't agree on blocking them en masse, especially
when the atmosphere is so hostile that people are being threatened
(both physically, and with harassment of them/their employers). What
I do think is that pseudonyms (without an attached real-world
identity) should be given a shorter leash.
Most of all, I don't think any rules that we invent here are going to
solve the problem. What's needed is good discretion by the list
Ultimately what I'm posting here is just a public suggestion to the
maintainers. It should be their final decision what to do. And if
you don't like it, start your own list, or join someone else's.
More information about the talk