[OSM-talk] Data reconciliation. Removing CT/ODbL declined users.
toby.murray at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 01:49:28 BST 2011
One *BIG* note that needs to be put out there specifically for the US:
User balrog-kun has explicitly declined the license. He ran a bot that
expanded abbreviations in TIGER street names in the western US which
means that virtually every named street west of the Mississippi shows
up as "tainted" in P2.
He has explicitly stated multiple times that he intends for these bot
edits to be relicensed under ODbL. So if balrog-kun is the only
declining user to have touched a road, there is no need to replace it.
The "ODBL coverage" map ( http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/ )
takes this into account but P2 does not. I think the map assumes any
change made in a changeset with a bot=yes tag can be relicensed
although I'm not sure on the exact implementation.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> The License Working Group takes the position that it is now
> appropriate to begin reconciling the data touched by users who have
> explicitly declined CT/ODbL. LWG feels that those users who have not
> responded should have a grace period of another week or two. You can
> find the list of usernames that have declined here.
> http://fred.dev.openstreetmap.org/license/ This page is updated every
> As always, map areas that you know well and in small pieces. At this
> point don't remove non-compliant data unless you are replacing it;
> another mapper may be able to replace it from local knowledge or
> survey. Bulk edits and or automated edits and or bots to reconcile
> non-compliant data are not welcome without previous, detailed
> discussion on the dev@ and or imports@ lists. Share your experiences
> to find the most effective workflows for improving OpenStreetMap data
> - Check your local mapping area for data that is not completely
> CT/ODbL compliant. In Potlatch2, choose Options, and check "Show
> license status". There is also a licensechange plugin for JOSM.
> - Consider sending personal messages before you edit to those who have
> not accepted or those who have declined based on your judgement. Some
> users have declined and indicated on their user pages that they will
> not reconsider. We do not wish to send unwelcome or duplicate
> messages. See also
> - Replace the data of users who have explicitly declined CT/ODbL with
> your own contributions from survey and other acceptable sources.
> - While this initial stage is focused on replacing data touched by
> users who have explicitly declined, you might find data touched by
> users who have not yet responded. We leave it to your judgement to
> replace that data now or wait another week or two.
> Once you begin replacing data, check on a regular basis whether the
> user in question hasn't changed his/her mind and has accepted CT/ODbL.
> You can look at http://fred.dev.openstreetmap.org/license/, this is
> updated every hour.
> Best regards,
> Richard Weait,
> on behalf of the License Working Group.
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk