[OSM-talk] Join the OSMF !

[Nathan Edgars II]

On 6/11/2011 4:43 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:
>
> On 10 Jun 2011, at 23:01, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>
>> You're still conflating two decisions. To continue with your referendum
>> analogy, someone may vote no on construction of a new arts center, yet
>> still
>> patronize it once it's complete. But one cannot 'vote' no on the license
>> change and then continue to edit once the process continues.
>
> You're misunderstanding what's going on – no one is voting to change the
> license or not.
>
> You are accepting a license or not. If you are unwilling to contribute
> under the terms the project needs your data under the project has no use
> for your data and asks you not to edit.

There have been claims that the high percentage of users agreeing to the 
change represents a vote to change. This is what I am refudiating.