[OSM-talk] Bing aerial imagery priorities

[Matthias Julius]

David Murn <davey at incanberra.com.au> writes:

> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:16 -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Murn <davey at incanberra.com.au> wrote:
>> > when all the nearmap-derived data is removed
>> 
>> It seems like you missed an email a couple of days ago?
>> 
>> Current NearMap derived data does not need to be removed from OSM
>> during the license change.
>
> It sounds like you mis-read the email.
>
> It does not 'need' to be removed, NearMap have simply said it CAN be
> relicenced, depending on the user who derived the data.
>
> Unless a user can guarantee that their edits were 100% based on nearmap
> and used no other CC source (unlikely for Australian users), they cant
> accept the CTs, which means all their edits must be removed.

Wasn't there a requirement to attribute Nearmap derived data?  Where
that has been done the data could be saved.

Matthias