[OSM-talk] License/CT issues: Let's not punish the world's disadvantaged, pls.
SomeoneElse
lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk
Thu Jun 23 01:15:37 BST 2011
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Steve Coast <steve at asklater.com
> <mailto:steve at asklater.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/22/2011 12:51 PM, 80n wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:31 PM, SteveC <steve at asklater.com
>> <mailto:steve at asklater.com>> wrote:
>>
>> How will fosm (assuming it reaches the stage of being
>> functional) continue to sync with OSM when the licenses are
>> incompatible?
>>
>>
>> 1. fosm.org <http://fosm.org> is functional, you should try it.
>
> I did. Perhaps we use different meanings for 'functional'. OSM
> shows you maps for example. Fosm has a link to 'maps' which 404s.
>
>
> did you see this?
> http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
>
>
>
Odd. zoom in to the dizzy heights of 16 (in Denmark WA FWIW) and you
get "picture coming soon". I picked Denmark because it's somewhere
that I've been and added stuff (to OSM, but would also like to see the
likes of FOSM using that same data too). Competion is good. It seems a
bit of a shame that the forkers are being let down by a rather poor
implementation (or so it seems) so far.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20110623/b40b8fc6/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list