[OSM-talk] License/CT issues: Let's not punish the world's disadvantaged, pls.
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Jun 23 22:14:06 BST 2011
Nic,
Nic Roets wrote:
> A modern democratic government would have found a way to defuse the
> situation long ago.
I've actually thought about that for quite a while and came to the
conclusion that the problems we're seeing are probably due to OSM being
such an unstructured, little-governed project.
If this project were one with a strong leadership and a more rigid
structure - so, skip the whole "OMSF doesn't want to rule the project"
stuff and so on -, then that leadership could probably have pulled
through the license change in a more organised fashion, and even one
that is - or at least looks! - more "democratic". (I say "at least
looks" because I have seen the inside of some such organisations and
generally you have a situation where the board decides what info goes
into the glossy membership magazine and what doesn't, so they usually
get whatever they want rubber-stamped by a majority.)
But even if we had such a more strictly organised project with a strong
leadership - something that I would oppose -, I don't really think that
this situation could be "defused" in any way. I mean, look at it - how
many people are making a fuss here? I think I count 6 or 7. Let's be
generous and say there are 20. Could even the best, brightest, and most
professional OSMF board ever implement a license change process where we
would *not* have 20 people arguing bitterly and spreading/believing all
sorts of FUD? Considering human nature, would it really be possible?
Could one implement a process so even, so fair, so smooth, that you
would *not* have 20 people who claim that their voice hasn't been heard,
that everyone is making a big mistake, and that we're all doomed?
I'm not saying that perfection shouldn't be strived for, but in the end
you have to break some eggs to make an omelette, and I think on the
whole we're not doing too bad.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list