[OSM-talk] License/CT issues: Let's not punish the world's disadvantaged, pls.

[John Smith]

On 24 June 2011 18:10, Ed Loach <ed at loach.me.uk> wrote:
> But I had a look at fosm.org yesterday and they (whoever "they" are
> - is there a fosmf?) seem to be making the same mistake that osm.org
> did with the original CTs; should they ever need to relicense (say
> move from cc-by-sa 2.0 to 3.0) the data, then as far as I can tell

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode

Section 4 part b

"You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this
License, a later version of this License with the same License
Elements as this License"