[OSM-talk] Licensing Working Group

[Nathan Edgars II]

Frederik Ramm wrote:
> 
> Assuming that Nearmap-derived data is indeed not compatible with the 
> future OSM license, I fail to understand how contributing data that will 
> later be deleted is a "privilege".
> 
(a) the license change is not a certainty
(b) the OSM instance run by OSMF is not the only project using the data
(including the last cc-by-sa dump if the license does change)


Frederik Ramm wrote:
> 
> I will not discuss this issue further on the talk list, as it is a topic 
> for legal-talk and will only annoy those on talk who are not interested 
> in legal matters.
I fail to see how discussion of the future of the project doesn't belong on
this list.

--
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Licensing-Working-Group-tp6199509p6203454.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.