[OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Mon May 2 11:59:52 BST 2011
Hi,
On 05/02/11 12:22, Thomas Davie wrote:
>> Discuss on this forum instead of IRC. It's self recording of
>> *everything* that's said& allows *all* to contribute at *all*
>> times.
>
> But causes discussions that could be had in 10 minutes to get spread
> out over 10 weeks ;)
Dave is right about the advantages of asynchronous discussion; I usually
prefer that as well. But things being dragged out endlessly really is a
serious disadvantage, and not acceptable in many cases.
In an IRC meeting you will usually have a small number of people and all
of them are (or are at least expected to be) "there", i.e. they will
read and participate, and you can get a quick idea of what the majority
thinks.
On IRC if someone comes up with a stupid idea, someone can say soemthing
like "motion to ignore Fred's stupid idea and get on with our agenda",
and then everyone will say aye and Fred is expected to accept that. That
kind of discipline is necessary if you want to make decisions
efficiently and not waste everyone's time - precious time, I might add,
since for many the weekly hour on SWG IRC is not the only recurring
meeting they attend.
On a mailing list, and certainly not on this mailing list, you do not
have that discipline. Someone comes up with a stupid idea, is told by a
bunch of others that his idea is stupid, but nonetheless continues with
posting after posting.
It's ok to have a forum where people can air their views ad infinitum,
but it is not suitable for making decisions. Maybe it is possible to
find a combination. SWG usually announce their agenda well ahead so
community is free to discuss that on the list beforehand (at the SWG
meeting someone could then say "mood on list seems to favour this/that",
of course SWG could still decide otherwise). Problem is that, being
conducted by humans like us, SWG meetings do not always follow the
agenda strictly. Might be necessary to add discipline to SWG meetings in
form of "don't discuss stuff that wasn't on the agenda - put them on
agenda for next week", then again that would cause more bueraucracy
overhead and reduce usefulness...
Bye
Frederik
More information about the talk
mailing list