[OSM-talk] Skip geographical (redundant) address tags

[Pierre-Alain Dorange]

Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com> wrote:

> Nope, it makes sense all the time. Cause boundaries really are not ment
> for deducting information onto what's inside. This really slows down any
> kind of processing (much much more than having data duplicated which 
> only takes up a bit more disk space).

Nominatim use them (boundariy relations) efficiently.

Adding extra data on every address is not a bit more space it can be
huge when you add addresses on every house of a city. And that also
really slow down things.

-- 
Pierre-Alain Dorange
OSM experiences : <http://www.leretourdelautruche.com/map/>