[OSM-talk] anonymous edits

[Vincent Pottier]

Le 28/05/2011 09:17, Martijn van Exel a écrit :
> Yes, it would deliberately be constrained to nodes. Checking existing
> nodes would definitely have to be part of it, using (fuzzy) name
> matching within a radius of the new object. Fact remains that the
> location may be less accurate than desirable, due to a bad GPS fix in
> urban areas and more generally lower grade GPS receivers in
> smartphones. To me however, this does not outweigh the advantage of
> offering a low barrier to entry way of adding something to OSM.
If the proxy, and other tools like keepright, gives interfaces to 
patroll the POIs, let's say having "osmadd" as last user, it would 
increase managing such osm access.

If a boot follows the added POIs and improves filters (baysian... ) on 
what appends to the POIs (moved, tags tranfered to an area, deleted...) 
for the scrapper... See http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Salebot 
(in French)
> Picking pubs
> as an example, one would just tweet "@osmadd Bellman Bar" would add a
> pub named Bellman Bar[2].
Or some other examples :
"@osmadd Bar de l'U #bar http://osm.org/go/0CUk0xTy0--",
"@osmadd My Bakery #bakery http://osm.org/go/0CUmREabt--",
"@osmadd My Bedroom #hotel http://osm.org/go/0CUmRENJw--",
"@osmadd #parking http://osm.org/go/0CUkZyJRh--"
"@osmadd #drinking_water http://osm.org/go/0CUk04eNB--"

"@osmadd #!parking http://osm.org/go/0CUk5GGnR--" (should not delete 
automaticaly, but add to osmbugs !)
--
FrViPofm