[OSM-talk] permament access restrictions and routing
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Dec 24 15:36:25 GMT 2012
Sounds like perhaps highway=pedestrian, vehicle=destination would be closer
to what we're looking for?
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> wrote:
> 2012/12/24 Maarten Deen <mdeen at xs4all.nl>:
> > On 2012-12-23 23:53, Chris Hill wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23/12/12 15:41, Stan Berka wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yesterday, I did navigation to my work place here in Warsaw using
> Osmand
> >>> o my G2. The route I was given led through Warsaw Old Town. The
> problem
> >>> with this is, the Old Town is closed to most vehicles, year long,
> except for
> >>> special vehicles (shop supply, city services etc). Thus, the route was
> >>> completely useless since I'm not a firetruck driver. How can this
> problem
> >>> be resolved, so OSM routers can generate more useful?
> >>
> >> that sounds like a highway=pedestrian to me.
> >
> >
> > You could add a access=destination to it. Then routing should be done
> only
> > to addresses on those roads and the roads should not be used to go from
> A to
> > B.
>
>
> You should't add access=destination to this, because the OP wrote that
> the road is closed for vehicles besides some exceptions like loading
> and emergency vehicles.,Access=destination would be allowing access
> for everyone who has to go to an address in the area.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20121224/e8cc0c6f/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list