[OSM-talk] Contact And Remap Campaign

[Richard Fairhurst]

Graham Jones wrote:
> Maybe I am naive, but I struggle to believe that people are really 
> that vindictive - they have all put effort into contributing to the 
> project over time.  That would come into the category of taking 
> a relaxing hobby too seriously to me!

Hi, you must be new round here. ;)

> Even if this is the case, I think that it would still be better to 
> risk someone declining at the last minute than decide to delete 
> peoples work when I believe that there is a very good chance 
> that that is not what they want.

It depends on circumstances, really. At the moment I'm concentrating on
replacing decliners' work. If someone appears genuinely to be unaware, then
it's certainly more sensible to try different avenues to contact them than
to remap.

But where there's an "undecided" who I know very well is aware of the
issues, has strong opinions on them, and just hasn't clicked the button
either way (such as sherbourne and 80n in the UK), I won't have any
compunction about replacing their edits. There's an outside possibility on
2nd April that I'll have wasted my time, but that's a risk I'm prepared to
take.

cheers
Richard



--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Contact-And-Remap-Campaign-tp5456674p5469226.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.