[OSM-talk] [talk-au] [sharedmapau] Re: Mass revert now??

Eugene Alvin Villar seav80 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 17:30:09 GMT 2012


On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/10/2012 12:16 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>>
>> In short, this remapping exercise I'm doing actually leads to better
>> data quality. So I disagree with your assertion that the license
>> change is "a disruptive change for little or no benefit".
>
>
> So what you're saying is that you're only improving the map because the OSMF
> is forcing you to?

So what? The map gets improved in the end. And I have considered the
whole license debate and have agreed with the need for the CT and the
arguments for ODbL, so I don't see any problem.



More information about the talk mailing list