[OSM-talk] Dealing with the tainted data

Mikel Maron mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 10 19:41:32 GMT 2012


Ok, I'm just going to jump in and say this thread does not need to continue. Please don't respond.

-talk@ moderators.
 
== Mikel Maron ==
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron


>________________________________
> From: Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com>
>To: Chris Hill <osm at raggedred.net> 
>Cc: talk at openstreetmap.org 
>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 2:17 PM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Dealing with the tainted data
> 
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Chris Hill <osm at raggedred.net> wrote:
>
>> Is this a wind up? What makes you think Bing is accurate? Bing is 12
>> (twelve) years old here.
>
>When someone who declines the CT decides to offer advice on how to fix
>the data lost by CT decliners, it's entirely reasonable for you to be
>skeptical.
>
>- Serge
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120110/dbfe196c/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list