[OSM-talk] 23 ideas for osm and its forks
Mikel Maron
mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Fri Jan 13 14:40:16 GMT 2012
Do I really have to say it? Please do not have this kind of discussion here.
Promotion of forks is off topic.
We do not need to rehash debate about odbl and cc.
Yes, ideas are great, but consider, this is an OSM list.
-Mikel and moderators
== Mikel Maron ==
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>________________________________
> From: Robert Scott <lists at humanleg.org.uk>
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 4:38 AM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] 23 ideas for osm and its forks
>
>On Friday 13 January 2012, mick wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:00:17 +0100
>> Mike Dupont <jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello world,
>> >
>> > I have written down all my ideas so far on an ideascale i setup
>> >
>> > http://fosm.ideascale.com/
>> >
>> > here you have 23 new ideas for #osm,
>> > independent of how they are implemented, all applicable to osm commonmap
>> > fosm etc.
>> > you are invited to join the conversation.
>> >
>> > lets make the world a better place
>> >
>> > happy hacking,
>> >
>> > mike
>> >
>> I applaud your efforts, OSM is good and has the potential to be truly great if more people thought about what could be done instead of shouting down any ideas that vary from their own blinkered vision.
>
>False. What OSM is short of is people who implement ideas and follow them through to completion. Ideas are something we've never been short of.
>
>
>robert.
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120113/550865ba/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list