[OSM-talk] Critical Mass for license change-over
Nick Whitelegg
Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk
Fri Jan 27 23:48:48 GMT 2012
Hi Mike and Graham,
>We should not assume that contributors' acceptance of the new licence means that they are particularly in favour of it - they may have just accepted because it was easier than getting involved in the >argument, and did not see it as doing any harm. From a personal point of view I fall into that category - I have no interest in changing the licence, but am not against it per-se, so accepted. Because I see >negligible benefit in changing the licence, I find it very hard to justify data loss by progressing with it.
+1 on this : this is precisely my view.
I really don't mind one way or the other about the licence, and have kept out of it until now mostly because I have no wish to get into arguments... but what I definitely don't want to see are large holes appearing on the map come April 1st. I am particularly concerned about my local patch, Hampshire, with a former mapper, almost certainly in the top 5 Hampshire contributors, having declined the CTs. I do wonder if it will do more harm than good to switch over.
Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120127/25c2b57c/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list