[OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

[Richard Fairhurst]

NopMap wrote:
> It's good that most of Britain has been processed, but it 
> appears that the two areas containing London have failed 
> repeatedly. As they probably contain the most complex 
> data and highest density, I think they are critical and if 
> they cannot be processed I'd expect the bot to run into 
> trouble in most large metropolitan areas in Europe.

I believe the London (west) one was an issue with an odd relation: there's
special-case handling in the code for multipolygons, and this relation had
been a multipolygon at one point in its history but not at another. This has
been fixed so will should succeed on a future pass. As Robert has mentioned,
London (east) has succeeded.

cheers
Richard



--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Update-on-redaction-bot-and-minutely-diffs-tp5716307p5716818.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.