[OSM-talk] [Talk-GB] England Cycling Data project: DfT cycling data now available for merging
rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com
rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 16:00:37 BST 2012
On , Ed Loach <ed at loach.me.uk> wrote:
> Thanks Rob, but in this case the lanes are on both sides of the road
> in the relevant places. And, as you note, left and right are
> relative to the direction of the OSM way, so the direction each
> country drives on isn't relevant.
So are you saying that lanes tagged as either cycleway:left=lane or
cycleway:right=lane are both to be rode in the direction of the way? If not
then the side each country drives on must be relevant. (note that a
cycle "lane" is different from a cycle "path" - a "lane" lies within the
main road carriageway).
> I guess I was really asking is
> whether I should tag both :left and :right or whether there was a
> :both equivalent.
> In the case of cycle lanes you need to use left and right precisely
> because it eliminates the need to know which side people drive on,
> which using forward and backward would require.
I don't see this. Right and Left tell you where the lane is, but it does
not tell a user (or routing software) which direction you can ride in. This
requires knowledge of which side of the road each country drives on (or
forward/backward tags).
> - snip -
Rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120618/9405e69e/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list