[OSM-talk] OSM : It's a shame !!!
andrzej zaborowski
balrogg at gmail.com
Tue May 29 11:00:37 BST 2012
On 29 May 2012 11:01, Thomas Davie <tom.davie en gmail.com> wrote:
> If I remember correctly (someone correct me if I don't), a lawyer has agreed that it's okay to keep node positions and ways where a user would reasonably have created the same way from an ODbL compatible data source.
I don't know if a lawyer has said that, but I think it's unlikely to
apply to tracing from imagery, first because the node positions are so
unlikely to match if recreated from imagery, and secondly because
Potlatch, I think, now has a whole mode designed to get rid of
original node positions and add new ones quickly. (It's still a huge
simplification with many open questions -- what about the
directionality of ways where the direction is not significant, i.e. no
oneway=yes tag -- this information could constitute a protected
database on its own but all the "remapping" methods retain such
information.)
Cheers
More information about the talk
mailing list