[OSM-talk] (dis)Honesty and Copyright

[Floris Looijesteijn]

Gert,

Although I would have chosen a different tone of voice you are
absolutely right to raise this issue.

Let's just try to keep the discussion civilized.

Greetings,
Floris Looijesteijn

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen <g.gremmen at cetest.nl> wrote:

> ** **
>
> I am really astonished about the way some users on this list****
>
> react to a claim to respect  (my and CC-by-SA) copyright .****
>
> ** **
>
> The whole business of changeing license IS about copyright.****
>
> If there is only a single grain of non-respect to copyright in your heads*
> ***
>
> (those that are addressed, do know who I mean),****
>
> why bother supporting a license change then that is about****
>
> respect on copyright ????  Everything up and running up in your heads?****
>
> ** **
>
> If TomTom or Nokia (just to mention a few major players) ****
>
> will find proof of the slightest infraction (well ok, a bit more then that)
> ****
>
> of copyrights,  in OSM’s database****
>
> they will publish that at a future moment  that suits them best….****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Gremmen, ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120529/834c5bd2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 70 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120529/834c5bd2/attachment.gif>