[OSM-talk] Re : Community Edit Monitoring vs Worldwide BOT Coverage in Changesets

Pierre Béland infosbelas-gps at yahoo.fr
Mon Oct 1 14:08:10 BST 2012



Thanks Ilya.
 Pierre 



________________________________
 De : Ilya Zverev <zverik at textual.ru>
À : Talk <talk at openstreetmap.org> 
Envoyé le : Lundi 1 octobre 2012 1h28
Objet : [OSM-talk] Community Edit Monitoring vs Worldwide BOT Coverage in Changesets
 
Pierre Béland wrote:
> The changesets listed were reduced by half when providing the url http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets?bbox=-73.6318%2C45.409%2C-73.444%2C45.4946 with http://positron96.appspot.com/osmfilter.html.

> This solution would effectively eliminate an important amount of changesets from the History Report if it was adopted.

>
 Therefore, this solution does not cover all the situations. When a 
worldwide changeset covers partly a local area, it is quite uneasy to 
detect >wich objects were modified in this local area. Especially 
when the changeset  affects
 hundreds of objects.

Try http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/scripts/rss.php?bbox=-73.6318%2C45.409%2C-73.444%2C45.4946
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20121001/fb095ef2/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list