[OSM-talk] Bad (wrong?) OSM publicity?

[woll]

Jonathan Bennett wrote
> It is not the NYT making that statement, but reporting the fact that
> someone else made it. Whatever we think of its accuracy, Mapion's
> spokesman did actually say that, so the NYT has made no factual error
> that needs correcting. At best we could expect a right to reply, which I
> believe the second article gave us.

Yes, I understand that.

However, I don't think that the second article counts as a "right to reply",
because the rebuttal is hidden at the bottom of a different article that is
mainly about Google and Navitime, and the second article is not referenced
from the first in a way that indicates that it contains a rebuttal of the
contents of the first.

I think that something along the lines of "OSM members refute this
statement", inside the first article, would be a "right to reply".




--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Bad-wrong-OSM-publicity-tp5727276p5728640.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.