[OSM-talk] Who is a good mapper? Who isn't?

[Maarten Deen]

On 2012-10-10 22:22, Richard Weait wrote:
> What are the results?
>
> Some respondents mentioned that close-but-not-touching ways made for 
> a
> "bad mapper" but were generally very understanding on this point.  It
> was seen more as an indication of inexperience.
>
> The Big Pet Peeve that identified bad mappers was "poor or missing 
> comments."
>
> I've taken a go at graphing comment quality.  This is not science of
> course.  Try it yourself; how would you measure comment quality?
>
> http://imgur.com/ibK76

The question is: how do _you_ measure comment quality? These numbers 
say nothing to me. You must have some formula to convert a comment to a 
quality.

> The most common comment quality is 18.
> Half of all accounts have comment quality from 13 to 36.
> Bots usually have comment quality under one.
>
> Many of the named bad mappers have comment quality under 6.  Given 
> the
> number of mappers who specifically mentioned comment quality, should
> not be a surprise.

So high = good quality? Even that was not clear.

Regards,
Maarten