[OSM-talk] Standard way across edits to tag changesets
Paul Norman
penorman at mac.com
Sun Oct 21 21:59:32 BST 2012
> From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:liste at letuffe.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:41 PM
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Standard way across edits to tag changesets
>
> Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 22:26:56, Marc a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks for your proposal. I commented it.
>
> Those were very good comment, I integrated most of them. But I'm usure
> if "bot=yes" wasn't allready used. If that was the case, I think
> compatibility with what has been done is more important than the tag's
> name.
The following are the changeset tags used at least 100 times as of a couple
weeks ago
created_by | 12488949
comment | 9882933
version | 2013859
build | 2011697
bot | 317744
source | 85151
create_by | 6607
redacted_changesets | 4046
created by | 3812
survey_date | 1097
transport | 1024
survey_type | 1015
CLC:content | 880
CLC:year | 880
created | 734
is_in | 725
source:date | 655
note | 529
type | 517
is_in:country | 473
(new key) | 411
import | 324
author | 249
Source | 210
user | 202
source:name | 201
source_url | 193
source_ref | 186
bot_url | 185
osc filename | 170
is_in:state | 167
reviewed | 140
url | 110
merged | 104
uploaded_by | 102
name | 100
A few comments on the ones that may not be obvious:
Build/version are used by some editors to expand on created_by
transport=car and transport=foot are the two common values for that key
bot=yes created_by values indicate overwhelmingly specialized programs (e.g.
the redaction bot)
The current best practice tagging for an import changeset appears to be
import=yes, source=* and website=link to the appropriate wiki website.
It is also useful sometimes to have internal upload details in the changeset
tags (e.g. a filename or unique ID which allows you to find which upload
failed if problems are later found)
More information about the talk
mailing list