[OSM-talk] opendata diagram

[Paul Norman]

Non-commercial only licenses discriminate against fields of endeavor and are
definitely not open. See 6 of http://opensource.org/docs/osd or 8 of
http://opendefinition.org/okd/. No derivative licenses are also not open -
you can't modify the data.

 

Another explanation is
http://freedomdefined.org/Permissible_restrictions#Restrictions_which_are_no
t_permissible. CC doesn't claim that any NC or ND license is open either.

 

From: Pavel Melnikov [mailto:positron96 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 8:31 PM
To: Simone Aliprandi
Cc: talk at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] opendata diagram

 

Forgive my incompetence, but what about other open licenses? Say,
CC-non-commercial, Cc-no-derivatives, and a whole bunch of combinations of
by, sa, nc, nd? Em you consider them not-open? 
I'm sure there are more examples, I only know about cc ones.

On Sep 3, 2012 3:04 AM, "Simone Aliprandi" <simone.aliprandi at gmail.com>
wrote:

I realized a diagram including all the most important opendata
licenses that are now available, and classifying them according to
their legal effects (attribution and share-alike, attribution only,
public domain). I hope this work can be useful to better understand
the actual situation of geodata (open)licensing:
http://aliprandi.blogspot.it/2012/05/opendata-graph.html
Bye,
--
Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120902/28ea57d6/attachment-0001.html>