[OSM-talk] opendata diagram

[Maurizio Napolitano]

If you read the opendefinition

“A piece of content or data is open if anyone is free to use, reuse,
and redistribute it — subject only, at most, to the requirement to
attribute and/or share-alike.”

(here more details - http://opendefinition.org/okd/)

you can understand that the CC-NC, CC-ND and the mix of this aren't
open license.
these are public licenses
Jordan Hatcher - the main author of the ODbL and the project Open Data Commons -
made this schema

http://www.jordanhatcher.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Open_v_Public_licenses_Venn.002-001.png


On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Pavel Melnikov <positron96 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Forgive my incompetence, but what about other open licenses? Say,
> CC-non-commercial, Cc-no-derivatives, and a whole bunch of combinations of
> by, sa, nc, nd? Em you consider them not-open?
> I'm sure there are more examples, I only know about cc ones.