[OSM-talk] Import guidelines & OSMF/DWG governance

Vincent Pottier vpottier at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 13:57:50 BST 2012


Le 18/09/2012 13:51, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
>
> I'd put it like this: someone who didn't respect the import guidelines
> valid for  almost one year was temporarily blocked. What's the
> problem? That's what the DWG is for.
>

> how many have spoken up against it? I'd expect from every mapper who
> wants to import something to read the current import guidelines and to
> act accordingly.
>
"current" ? Is it a joke ?

I've started integrating buildings from the French cadastre more thant 
one year ago. I had read the guidelines long before, when a second 
account was a recommandation. And talking with the French community, I 
agreed with the fact that it did not applyed in this case... so I 
starded uploading buildings...

I've never heard any announce about changes, nor discussions about 
possible changes, nor... in the guidelines. And I'm not so skillfull in 
English to go often on this page and re-read it if not necessary. And I 
think I'm not the only one on the Earth.

So I am integrating buildings from Cadastre for years... Long before the 
guidelines were changed... Maybe I should be bloked...

Now that I (and not only me) know that the guidelines are subjects of 
arbitrary changes without a wide announce, I would read this page each 
time before i'm importing a postbox from opendata ?

Tell me it's a joke !
--
FrViPofm



More information about the talk mailing list