[OSM-talk] Import guidelines & OSMF/DWG governance
Pieren
pieren3 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 14:06:18 BST 2012
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jonathan Bennett
<openstreetmap at jonno.cix.co.uk> wrote:
> On 18/09/2012 13:42, Vincent Privat wrote:
> OK, if we're playing WikiLawyer pissing games, the statement about DWG's
> power says "authorised", not "limited to". Part of DWG's remit is to
> deal with disputes, and this is very clearly a dispute over data. Ergo...
The DWG is mandated by the foundation ([1]), no ? And here ([2]), it
says "The OpenStreetMap Foundation is an international not-for-profit
organization supporting, but not controlling, the OpenStreetMap
Project."
The dispute is not between contributors but between the French
community and the DWG...
Pieren
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
"The Data Working Group (data at osmfoundation.org) is authorised by the
Foundation to deal with accusations of copyright infringement and
serious Disputes and Vandalism. Minor incidents of vandalism should be
dealt with by the local community using counter-vandalism tools and
processes. "
[2] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Main_Page
More information about the talk
mailing list