[OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update

[Greg Troxel]

Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
>
>> Since you[1] are trying to revise guidelines that are found to be
>> acceptable across the community
>
> Could you provide evidences about this ? Since the vast majority of
> the community does not care about import guidelines, I would like to
> know how you can be sure about this.

I'm mostly a lurker in these discussions, and generally more pro-import
than many who participate in import decisions.  But I find the 'separate
account for import' to be an utterly reasonable (along with the rest of
the guidlines), easy to follow rule, and I am boggled by the objections
to it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20120919/2d343d05/attachment.pgp>