[OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french cadastre
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 01:12:34 BST 2012
2012/9/26 Lester Caine <lester at lsces.co.uk>:
> Personally I would prefer to see
> http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/funnybuilding.png as a single closed
> outline box.
I think that 6-7 buildings (looking at the bing aerial
http://it.bing.com/maps/?v=2&cp=44.277739~0.502686&lvl=20&dir=0&sty=h&where1=44,277748%200,502839&form=LMLTCC
, maybe there is more but on a first remote approximation I could see
6 or 7) would be much better than a "single closed outline box",
especially, if the tag is something like building=yes which is used
for "one" building, not groups of them.
There is a really huge difference between 1 big building and 7
adjacent small ones. The problem is, that the cadastre version doesn't
seem to make sense when compared to the aerial imagery. It is better
to have detailed outlines, but only if this detail is depicting
reality.
cheers,
Martin
More information about the talk
mailing list