[OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark)

[Liz Barry]

+1 to Alex's original post -- the new attribution mark is well designed
and versatile for its purposes. The shape of the folded map links the
attribution mark with our logo.

+1 spiffed up copyright page BUT the proportion of image to information
"above the fold" still needs finetuning, as well as the exact text.


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> John,
>
>
> On 04/24/2013 03:56 PM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
>
>> The proposed mark is very well suited as a replacement.  It is simple,
>> minimalistic, and works well on a variety of backgrounds.
>>
>
> You wrote the above as a "+1" to a statement from Mike Cuttler that said
>
>      What should be done first is establishing good visual identity for
>>     OpenStreetMap, primarily through logo (both long 'OpenStreetMap' and
>>     short 'OSM' version) with special attention for usability - meaning
>>     that we should be able to put it everywhere and brand would be
>>     recognizable.
>>
>
> Are you therefore saying that what has been designed as an attribution
> mark should be our new logo, or are you saying that there does not have to
> be a likeness between the logo and the attribution mark?
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk>
>



-- 
@lizbarry <http://twitter.com/lizbarry>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130424/95673b61/attachment.html>