[OSM-talk] Key Proposal wheelchair:toilet
colliar
colliar4ever at aol.com
Fri Jun 7 17:26:41 UTC 2013
Am 07.06.2013 14:26, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
>
> 2013/6/7 Christoph Bünte <christoph at sozialhelden.de
> <mailto:christoph at sozialhelden.de>>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> we at wheelmap.org <http://wheelmap.org> want to take our service to
> the next level by tagging public places wether there is an
> wheelchair accessible toilet or not. To start the discussion we
> prepared an key proposal:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/wheelchair:toilet
>
> Please let us know what you think about it.
There is a little typo under "applies to" first word.
>
> the proposal looks reasonable at first glance, if you see this as an
> attribute to something (and it will definitely be easier to evaluate
> this way). An alternative might be to tag explicitly the toilet and add
> wheelchair tags to the toilet.
>
> I checked with tag info and there are already tags in use:
>
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/toilets
> e.g.
> wheelchair:*toilets*
> <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wheelchair%3Atoilets>
> *toilets*:wheelchair
> <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/toilets%3Awheelchair>
>
> the suggestion for a toilet attribute on a POI according
> to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets is
> "toilets", that's why I suggest you change the wording in your proposal
> to plural. IMHO the most logical way would be toilets:wheelchair=yes/no
> but wheelchair:toilets is currently used far more often.
+1, for toilets:wheelchair=0-100, or even toilets:wheelchair:female=1
fly
-------------- n�chster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Bin�rdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname : signature.asc
Dateityp : application/pgp-signature
Dateigr��e : 262 bytes
Beschreibung: OpenPGP digital signature
URL : <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130607/823d7307/attachment.pgp>
More information about the talk
mailing list