[OSM-talk] Fw: Updated, more detailed international bdy. shapefiles (US Dept. of State Office of the Geographer)
emacsen at gmail.com
Mon Jun 17 00:28:30 UTC 2013
Anyone planning on using this data in OSM, please remember to follow
all guidelines on imports, and if you're in the US, to join the US
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Of interest to those of us working on boundaries. Some recent updates
> geographers at US State.
> * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 5:10 PM
> Subject: Updated, more detailed international bdy. shapefiles (US Dept. of
> State Office of the Geographer)
> I have you all on my list of folks interested in detailed international
> boundary lines.*
> An update to our worldwide Large Scale International Boundaries (LSIB
> version 5) can be found as of today at http://HIU.state.gov (under “data”,
> down near the bottom (“June 2013 LSIB v. 5”, 17mb.)) This data set is in
> the public domain; no restrictions on its use. It includes update such as
> an approximation of last month’s ICJ ruling on Burkina Faso-Niger’s
> Also, after many requests, Kate Schaefer (in our sister “HIU” branch)
> and I put together last fall a worldwide country polygon file as well, which
> most closely matches the Sept. 2012 version (LSIB4b) of our international
> lines. It is posted in the same place.
> We’re fortunate in this office (intact here at DoS since 1921) to have
> or have easy access to voluminous maps, treaties, and other international
> boundary information from the past 150 years. We are also fortunate that
> our colleagues in DoD (NGA) and in the UK (DGC) have been researching and
> digitizing international boundaries since the late 1990’s; we continue to
> work closely today. That’s given us a pretty good head start on quality
> control for the world’s 320-some international land boundaries.
> Considering the caveats in the attached doc (i.e., we follow US govt.
> policies; certainly anyone else using this data set can change it to conform
> to their own policies), we always welcome from professional geographers like
> yourselves any corrections, suggestions, questions on international land
> (not maritime!) boundaries, their history, alignments, lengths, etc.
> all the best,
> *if that’s not or no longer the case, let me know
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk