[OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary?

Clay Smalley claysmalley at gmail.com
Sun Mar 31 15:57:41 UTC 2013


This seems silly and useless. The imagery is subject to change and the way
will become obsolete. I don't see a point in mapping this, and I'm okay
with deleting these ways. But I'd rather hear from someone with more
experience before anything happens.
On Mar 31, 2013 10:39 AM, "ingalls" <nicholas.ingalls at gmail.com> wrote:

> It doesn't look like this is an isolated example, there are over a hundred
> of these
>
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=imagery#overview
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, ingalls <nicholas.ingalls at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey guys came across a really weird way.
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/104974280
>>
>> Not sure exactly what it is supposed to represent? Is it showing where
>> bing has high quality imagery? And secondly can I remove it!
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20130331/c66966a4/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list