[OSM-talk] Imagery Boundary?

Maarten Deen mdeen at xs4all.nl
Sun Mar 31 19:07:31 UTC 2013


On 2013-03-31 19:22, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 07:01:19PM +0200, Maarten Deen wrote:
>> It is a common and often-used method to indicate regions that have
>> high-resolution Bing imagery in an area where the rest is only
>> low-resolution.
>> I would not delete them. They serve a purpose. If you have a better
>> working suggestion (i.e. a low-hi-res overlay to use in the editors)
>> then you might have a point.
> 
> They are put into the database at a certain point where they might
> really show the area of HiRes Sat imagery. Nobody cares about them
> afterwards and bing regularly updates their imagary. So after a year
> you would need to correct them which in my cases nobody did over a 
> span
> of more then 2 months.
> 
> As they were wrong and nobody cared i deleted them.

Obviously, when somtheing is wrong you either correct or delete it. But 
that is stating the obvious. I think there is no debate about that.

Regards,
Maarten




More information about the talk mailing list