[OSM-talk] Launching OpenAddresses
ian.dees at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 21:45:38 UTC 2014
Not a stupid question at all.
I decided to collect this stuff outside of OSM for two reasons:
- An "address data" census is pretty interesting by itself, and learning
how to find it is useful.
- Having address data outside of OSM means we can make it more liberally
licensed for tons of people to use. I don't want to burden the amalgamation
of data with attribution or share-alike because the source data is usually
not copyrightable in the first place (at least in the U.S.).
- The import process for OSM is tedious, long, and a negative experience
that I didn't want to go through with every municipality in the country.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> Forgive the stupid question, but shouldn't this be in the OSM data?
> On Mar 25, 2014 4:29 PM, "Ian Dees" <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> As some of you know, I've been working on collecting as much address data
>> possible for the last couple years. I had created a spreadsheet to track
>> progress for myself and others had contributed their own entries. That
>> spreadsheet hit more than 300 entries tracking millions of address points
>> and parcel boundaries.
>> With the help of awesome people like Travis Pinney, Nick Ingalls, Tom
>> MacWright, and Alex Barth, this past weekend we released a website and a
>> data dump with the source data collected into one 1.6GB zip file. Check it
>> out here:
>> So far, you can add data easily in two ways:
>> - Submit an issue or pull request to the GitHub repo here:
>> - Fill out this form here:
>> It would be supremely cool if you took a minute or two and found address
>> parcel data in your area and added it to the index here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk