[OSM-talk] Detrimental validation software

[Yves]

Because its the purpose of this particular software.

On 16 octobre 2014 17:10:03 UTC+02:00, Maarten Deen <mdeen at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>On 2014-10-16 15:43, SomeoneElse wrote:
>> On 16/10/2014 14:28, Maarten Deen wrote:
>>> On 2014-10-16 15:15, Dave F. wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  I had a footpath between them.
>>> 
>>> So the problem is also that the check is wrong. Apperantly it looks
>at 
>>> major roads that are apart, but doesn't see that they are connected
>by 
>>> another road.
>>> IMHO these cases should not be shown at all.
>> 
>> Quite possibly, but as (Andrew Buck has already said) what really
>> happened here is that a mapper made a mistake.
>
>But he would not have been led there if it wasn't pointed out as an 
>error.
>
>>  It's not a software
>> problem so much as a human one
>
>I beg to differ. The roads were connected. Why show an error "two roads
>
>are not connected" when there is a connection.
>
>Regards,
>Maarten
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20141016/07a11d63/attachment.html>