[OSM-talk] Detrimental validation software

Yves yvecai at gmail.com
Thu Oct 16 16:04:01 UTC 2014

Because its the purpose of this particular software.

On 16 octobre 2014 17:10:03 UTC+02:00, Maarten Deen <mdeen at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>On 2014-10-16 15:43, SomeoneElse wrote:
>> On 16/10/2014 14:28, Maarten Deen wrote:
>>> On 2014-10-16 15:15, Dave F. wrote:
>>>>  I had a footpath between them.
>>> So the problem is also that the check is wrong. Apperantly it looks
>>> major roads that are apart, but doesn't see that they are connected
>>> another road.
>>> IMHO these cases should not be shown at all.
>> Quite possibly, but as (Andrew Buck has already said) what really
>> happened here is that a mapper made a mistake.
>But he would not have been led there if it wasn't pointed out as an 
>>  It's not a software
>> problem so much as a human one
>I beg to differ. The roads were connected. Why show an error "two roads
>are not connected" when there is a connection.
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org

Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20141016/07a11d63/attachment.html>

More information about the talk mailing list