[OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 122, Issue 63

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Sun Oct 26 17:58:38 UTC 2014

The current articles require the most senior 1/3  of the board to stand
down when an election is scheduled at a general meeting. Given that
non-election of incumbents that stand again has been rare, it
essentially doesn't guarantee fresh blood nor does it provide a maximum
accumulated term limit.


Am 26.10.2014 16:51, schrieb St Niklaas:
> Hi board members,
> I doubt if this is the right platform. Nevertheless I do have a simple
> question about the ins and outs of the board nomination and its members.
> Aren't there some rules in or for the OSMF board about who’s
> participating and how long and how many terms ? Should nt a schedule
> about it be a good idea, just to avoid some of the ideas ventilated
> through some of the Forums ? What about some legal rules as each year 2
> members have to step down and will be or not available for reelection.
> But for a max of 2 terms of 2- 3 years, it depends on the size of the board.
> Hendrikklaas
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20141026/c992766b/attachment.sig>

More information about the talk mailing list