[OSM-talk] route=road - What's that all about then?

[Paul Johnson]

For consistency sake, seems like relations are the way to go, even in one
route instances.
On Aug 22, 2014 10:08 AM, "Pieren" <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  What did you mean with this? Do you suggest we use relations when there
> are
> > multiple refs, and ways when there is only one ref?
>
> Yes. It's just a pragmatic approach : I use relations only if I have
> no easier alternative. Like a building : if it's a simple polygon, I
> don't use relations. If it has a courtyard, I create a multipolygon
> relation. In other words, it's not because some buildings need a
> multipolygon relation that we should create a multipolygon relation
> for each building.
>
> Pieren
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140903/15e052ab/attachment-0001.html>