[OSM-talk] 112k Wikidata tags to add to OSM

[Archer]

:Stonehenge: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q39671
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q587584 both WD objects match the same OSM
object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37118074

Berlin Wall: http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q5086 matches only one way of the
wall but the Wiki article says there are three parts of the wall and
different watchtowers left. Maybe those objects should get each their own
Wikidata-object.

Yosemite National Park <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q180402> (Q180402) node
Yosemite <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/408906523> should match the
national park

nothing spectacular yet. the main matching problems are villages, other
settlements and administrative divisions as Wikipedia doesn't distinguish
here. In Wikidata you have to distinguish to get a correct ontology.
district --> municipality --> settlements. Much consolidation has to be
done in Wikidata yet.

- suburbs:
Whitchurch, Bristol <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q7994194> (Q7994194) node
Whitchurch <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/29674271> maybe should match
the relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2944649 unclear, WP
article says "village" but the map shows the city council ward

Pihlajisto <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q3069705> (Q3069705)

node

Pihlajisto <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/206335421> maybe should match
the relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/190373 like the map in
WP shows

Ringwood East <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q7335020> (Q7335020)

node

Ringwood East <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2592650968> maybe should
match http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2401669
  + more examples if needed

- villages

Cerhonice <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q2140210> (Q2140210)

node

Cerhonice <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599176850> maybe should match
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/437515 Wikipedia says "is a village
and municipality". The village and the municipality have different areas
and therefore should be split into different objects in Wikidata
  + mismatch list +++

- towns:


 Hilpoltstein <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q521132> (Q521132)

Hilpoltstein <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240112461> (node) should
match the relation for the municipality "Hilpoltstein" and not the town:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240112461 For the town a different object
has to be created in Wikidata.


 Pocking <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q279629> (Q279629)

Pocking <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/63655606> (node) same case as
Hilpoltstein, should match the following relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/958087
  + many more examples if needed



   Lagoa <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q2652722> (Q2652722)

node

Lagoa <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25277559>

Lagoa Municipality <http://wikidata.org/wiki/Q985519> (Q985519)

node

Lagoa <http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25277559>







2014-09-05 11:06 GMT+02:00 Edward Betts <edward at 4angle.com>:

> I modified my code, adding more categories and extending the matching
> distance
> for some objects. I started checking addr:housename, some buildings have
> this
> tag but are missing the name tag.
>
> http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/
>
> There are now 112,278 matches found. I thought the extended range would
> help
> reduce the number of mismatches, but I now have 2,393 mismatches.
>
> http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/mismatches.html
>
> I've got some ideas about how to fix some of the mismatches. Many of the
> mismatches are villages represented by both a node and a relation, but the
> relation isn't tagged with place=village, so my code can't tell it
> represents
> the same thing. Maybe relations that represent villages should be tagged
> with
> place=village. I'll could modify my code so it rejects nodes inside a way
> or relation with the same name.
>
> Example: Sachsendorf, Germany
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240130457
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2253462
>
> --
> Edward.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20140906/66e95550/attachment.html>