[OSM-talk] Big Lakes

[malenki]

colliar wrote:

>Am 18.02.2015 um 14:48 schrieb malenki:
>> Jochen Topf wrote:
>> 
>>> Please do not add more (and more difficult cases like lakes on
>>> islands in lakes on land) to the data, otherwise this process will
>>> get more brittle than it already is.
>> 
>> Well, that is a word.
>> 
>> What do you think of the Great Lakes mapped (partly) both with
>> coastline and MPs?
>
>-1
>
>We already have problems with the update cycle differences of the
>coastline and the rest of the map. Would would not gain much and simply
>move the decision over to the renderer. Dual-Systems are confusing and
>lead to further divergence.

IMHO this is clear. I hope(d) for a recommendation what to keep and what
to drop.