[OSM-talk] new payment type

[Greg Knisely]

I think for that situation it could be easily handled with
payment:transponder=ez_pass;pikepass.  This is what is used for other
tags.  A great example of this is the ref tag.

As for "payment:fasttrak=no", I think if one would just leave the tag off
that would imply that it is not accepted.

  --Greg.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com> wrote:

> One exit may accept multiple methods, e.g. "ez pass or pikepass".  Thus
> the existing scheme seems more capable.
> With the existing scheme you could also write something like
> "payment:fasttrak=no" for a place you might reasonably expect fasttrak to be
> accepted, but it's not accepted.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150223/c1a1ad34/attachment.html>