[OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)
Tom MacWright
tom at macwright.org
Wed Jun 3 00:37:04 UTC 2015
Hi Mike,
Please propose an alternative.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2015 8:06 AM, "pmailkeey ." <pmailkeey at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > OSM's k=v design is completely a serious and unnecessary flaw. [...] OSM
> is 90% argument, 5% dead-end discussions and 5% progress. The whole is not
> a marketable product; it's not fit to be rated as 'beta'. Is this a
> significant cause of ex-mappers ? It's a flipping brilliant project but
> sadly lacking a great leader.
>
> It seems you are deeply unsatisfied with how OSM works. And your broad
> assertions such as that OSM is "not fit" or is "90% argument" are
> completely unfounded. Sure, OSM is not perfect but I seriously doubt that
> the k=v design or some other point you have raised is the culprit.
>
> Feel free to leave and create a separate project. You can even be the
> "great leader" for that new project that you think OSM needs. If your ideas
> are indeed better, then your project will succeed and you can then prove
> OSM wrong.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150602/d557b16b/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list