[OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)

[Warin]

On 3/06/2015 10:37 AM, Tom MacWright wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Please propose an alternative.

He has been .. on other threads..
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:seav80 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Jun 3, 2015 8:06 AM, "pmailkeey ." <pmailkeey at googlemail.com
>     <mailto:pmailkeey at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>     > OSM's k=v design is completely a serious and unnecessary flaw.
>     [...] OSM is 90% argument, 5% dead-end discussions and 5%
>     progress. The whole is not a marketable product; it's not fit to
>     be rated as 'beta'. Is this a significant cause of ex-mappers ?
>     It's a flipping brilliant project but sadly lacking a great leader.
>
>     It seems you are deeply unsatisfied with how OSM works. And your
>     broad assertions such as that OSM is "not fit" or is "90%
>     argument" are completely unfounded. Sure, OSM is not perfect but I
>     seriously doubt that the k=v design or some other point you have
>     raised is the culprit.
>
>     Feel free to leave and create a separate project. You can even be
>     the "great leader" for that new project that you think OSM needs.
>     If your ideas are indeed better, then your project will succeed
>     and you can then prove OSM wrong.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     talk mailing list
>     talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150603/a62d4f2e/attachment.html>