[OSM-talk] Some thoughts against remote mapping
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 08:55:24 UTC 2015
sent from a phone
> Am 15.06.2015 um 01:24 schrieb Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:
> There was a humours suggestion to map animal paths, rejected as not something wanted in OSM.
who in osm would be able to reject what can be mapped?
> To some native farmers those paths may be very significant. The rejection reflects a 'western culture'.
farmers or hunters? If something is sufficiently significant to someone (and persistent) to map it and potentially maintain the mapping, he will just do it, not?
More information about the talk