[OSM-talk] Some thoughts against remote mapping

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Am 15.06.2015 um 01:24 schrieb Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:
> 
> There was a humours suggestion to map animal paths, rejected as not something wanted in OSM.


who in osm would be able to reject what can be mapped?


> To some native farmers those paths may be very significant. The rejection reflects a 'western culture'.


farmers or hunters? If something is sufficiently significant  to someone (and persistent) to map it and potentially maintain the mapping, he will just do it, not?

cheers 
Martin