[OSM-talk] Some thoughts against remote mapping

[Clifford Snow]

This Friday night I'm going to close out the quick, three question survey
on remote mapping thread. If you haven't answered the survey already, go to
 https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/TRQYHFP to answer the three questions.

Clifford

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 06/15/2015 09:55 PM, john whelan wrote:
> > Perhaps we need something like the HOT validation system in OSM more
> > generally but I don't know how it would work.  Locally OSM mappers have
> > used a rich range of tags, I'd say about 25% other than highways didn't
> > get rendered for one reason or another when they were initially tagged.
>
> On the German forum and mailing lists, occasionally newbies will pop up
> and say "I've mapped this and that, could somebody have a look if
> everything is correct?"
>
> Perhaps it could be as easy as setting a changeset tag "review=yes
> please", and then a small web site listing changesets that have this tag
> and don't yet have a review discussion entry or something, so
> experienced mappers could look if there's something in need of review in
> their area.
>
> I'd be very careful to make sure this is voluntary; even a hint at a
> possible *mandatory* review process will immediately have everyone
> pointing out where this has got Google ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>



-- 
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150617/a7aeaeae/attachment.html>